A Novel RP-HPLC Method for the Development and Validation of Metoprolol Succinate in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
Hemangi Somnath Chaudhari*, Javesh K. Patil
P.S.G.V.P Mandal’s College of Pharmacy, Shahada, Dist – Nandurbar- 425409, Maharashtra India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: hemangichaudhari1133@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The objective of the present study was to develop and validate a simple, accurate, and robust reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for the estimation of Metoprolol Succinate in bulk drug and marketed formulations. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm × 4.6mm, 5µm) with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of Methanol and 0.1% Orthophosphoric Acid in Water (60:40 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0mL/min. The detection was carried out at 222nm using a UV detector. The method demonstrated a good retention time with a total runtime of 6 minutes. The linearity of the method was observed in the concentration range of 5–15µg/mL with a correlation coefficient (R²) of 0.99994. The accuracy of the method was confirmed with a recovery of 99.40%, and precision results showed %RSD values well within the acceptable limit (<2.0%). The method also complied with ICH guidelines for parameters such as specificity, robustness, solution stability, and filter compatibility. The LOD and LOQ were calculated as 0.142µg/mL and 0.429µg/mL, respectively. Therefore, the developed RP-HPLC method is highly suitable for routine quality control analysis of Metoprolol Succinate in pharmaceutical formulations.
KEYWORDS: Metoprolol Succinate, RP-HPLC, Method Validation, Method Development, Assay.
|
Received on 25.07.2025 Revised on 20.08.2025 Accepted on 12.09.2025 Published on 08.10.2025 Available online from October 15, 2025 Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2025; 15(4):288-294. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2025.00045 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|
1. INTRODUCTION:
Metoprolol succinate1-2 is a cardioselective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker used in the management of hypertension, angina pectoris, and heart failure. Its mechanism of action involves the selective blockade of beta1-adrenergic receptors located primarily in cardiac tissue, which leads to a reduction in heart rate, myocardial contractility, and cardiac output, thereby decreasing oxygen demand. Although metoprolol is beta1-selective, this effect is not absolute, and at higher plasma concentrations it may also inhibit beta2 receptors found in bronchial and vascular smooth muscles. It exhibits no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and demonstrates membrane-stabilizing properties only at concentrations far exceeding those needed for beta-blockade.
Chemically, metoprolol succinate is the succinate salt of (±)-1-(isopropylamino)-3-[p-(2-methoxyethyl) phenoxy]-2-propanol, with a molecular formula of C₃₄H₅₆N₂O₁₀ and a molecular weight of 652.8g/mol. It appears as a white crystalline powder and is freely soluble in water and methanol, sparingly soluble in ethanol, and practically insoluble in several organic solvents. The drug is formulated as an extended-release tablet designed for once-daily administration, providing consistent plasma levels over a 24hour period. The structural formula includes a phenyl ring, a methoxyethyl group, and an isopropylamino moiety on a propanol backbone. Metoprolol succinate is available in strengths equivalent to 25mg, 50mg, 100mg, and 200 mg of metoprolol tartrate. The chemical structure of metoprolol succinate is shown in Figure1.
Fig No.1.Structure of metoprolol Succinate
Several analytical methods have been reported for the estimation of Metoprolol Succinate, both as a single drug and in combination with other compounds. However, most existing methods focus on its analysis in biological matrices or multi-drug formulations. Very few chromatographic methods are available for the estimation of Metoprolol Succinate as a single active ingredient in tablet dosage forms. This indicates a need for a simple, specific, and validated RP-HPLC method suitable for routine analysis in pharmaceutical quality control. The method developed in this study is designed to be rapid, accurate, precise, and economical, and complies with regulatory validation requirements.
High- pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC):3-7
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, also called High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography, is a column chromatography technique used in biochemistry and analysis to separate, identify, and quantify active compounds. This analytical technique is widely used to separate, identify, and quantify each constituent in a mixture. HPLC is a sophisticated column-based liquid chromatography method. In HPLC, the solvent is forced under high pressures of up to 400 atmospheres to separate elements based on relative affinities, rather than flowing naturally through the column. HPLC consists of a stationary phase column, a pump, and a detector to measure molecule retention periods. The retention period is influenced by interactions between the stationary phase, compounds under analysis, and solvents used. Small amounts of samples are added to the mobile phase stream, causing chemical or physical interactions with the stationary phase to delay the process. The amount of retardation depends on the analyte and stationery /mobile phase composition. Retention time refers to the time it takes for an analyte to elute. Solvents are miscible combinations of water or organic liquids. Gradient elution was employed to adjust the mobile phase composition during the study. The gradient separates analyte mixtures according to their affinity for the current mobile phase. The stationary phase and analyte determine the appropriate solvents, additives, and gradients.
Analytical method development:8
New procedures are being developed to evaluate novel products in the absence of established techniques. To detect pharmacopoeial or non-pharmacopoeial products, new techniques have been developed to minimize time and increase precision and strength. These approaches are refined and validated by preliminary tests. Alternative methods are developed and implemented to replace the current approach in a comparative laboratory setting, taking into account all available advantages and disadvantages.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Materials- Metoprolol Succinate was procured from a reliable source. Methanol (HPLC grade), 0.1% OPA, and other reagents were of analytical grade.
Instrumentation:
· HPLC System: Agilent 1260 Infinity II
· Detector: UV Detector
· Column: Phenomenex C18 (250 × 4.6mm, 5µm)
· UV Spectrophotometer: Jasco UV 550
Chromatographic Conditions
· Mobile phase: Methanol: 0.1% OPA (60:40)
· Flow rate: 1.0mL/min
· Detection wavelength: 222nm
· Injection volume: 20µL
· Column temp: 35°C
· Run time: 6min
HPLC method development:
Preparation of Standard Solution:
· Accurately weighed 25mg of Metoprolol Succinate and transferred it into a 25mL volumetric flask.
· Added 15–20mL of distilled water and sonicated to dissolve completely.
· Diluted to the mark with distilled water to prepare a 1000PPM stock solution.
· Pipetted 0.5mL of the stock solution into a 25mL volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with water to obtain a 20PPM solution.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solution for chromatographic development:
Metoprolol Succinate Standard stock solution was prepared by dissolving 25 mg Metoprolol Succinate into a 25 mL clean and dried volumetric flask added about 15-20 mL of Water to dissolve it completely and made volume up to the mark with Water (1000 PPM). Further diluted 2 ml of stock solution to 20 mL with mobile phase. (100 PPM).
Preparation of System suitability test (Metoprolol Succinate standard solution):
Weighed about 25mg of Metoprolol Succinate and transferred in 50mL volumetric flask, added 35 mL of Water, sonicated to dissolve it, made volume up to the mark with Water. Pipette out 0.5Ml from standard stock solution and transferred into 25ml volumetric flask and made volume up to the mark with mobile phase (10 µg/mL working concentration), chromatograms were Recorded.
Analysis of marketed Test sample:
Marketed test sample Having Name Met XL 50 mg tablets are selected for analysis and for Doing validation.
Sample preparation of Marketed test sample:
Weighed 20 tablets transferred in mortar pestle and crushed to fine powder. Mixed the contents with butter paper uniformly. Weighed the powder material equivalent to 2mg of Safinamide (81.20mg of powder material) and transferred to clean and dried 50mL of volumetric flask. Added 35 mL of Water, sonicated for 10minutes with intermittent shaking. After 10 minutes allow to cool the solution to room temperature and made volume up to the mark with Water. Filtered the solution through suitable 0.45µ syringe filter discarding 3-5mL of initial filtrate. Further diluted 1.5ml of filtered stock solution to 25ml with mobile phase (30mcg of Safinamide), injected the resultant solution and chromatograms were recorded and results are recorded.
Table No.1. Sample Prepared in duplicate. Summary of sample preparation as follows:
|
Sample |
Sample (mg) |
Diluted to (mL) |
Volume taken |
Diluted to (mL) |
|
Sample 1 |
128.2 |
50 |
0.5 |
25 |
|
Sample 2 |
128.8 |
50 |
0.5 |
25 |
Formula for % Assay calculation:
X
100
So, Placebo prepared at lab level by using formula as follows:
Table No.2 Placebo Preparation of metoprolol succinate
|
Sr. No. |
Ingredients |
Role |
Qty (mg) |
|
1 |
Lactose |
Filler |
80 |
|
2 |
Starch |
Binder |
5 |
|
3 |
Magnesium stearate |
Lubricant |
5 |
|
4 |
Talc |
Glidant |
5 |
|
5 |
crospovidone |
Disintegrants |
5 |
|
Total |
100 mg |
||
Total 10 gm of placebo prepared
3. VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD:9-13
The developed method for estimation of Metoprolol Succinate was validated as per ICH guidelines for following parameters.
1. Filtration Study:
Filtration study of an analytical procedure checks the interference of extraneous components from filter, deposition on filter bed and compatibility of filter with sample. this study was conducted with Metoprolol Succinate Test sample (Tablet solution). filtration study carried out with unfiltered and filtered test solution. During filtration activity 0.45 µm PVDF and 0.45µm Nylon syringe filters used by discarding 5 m). filtration sample.
2. Stability Of Analytical Solution
Stability study was conducted for standard and test sample solution. Stability study was performed at normal laboratory conditions. the solution was stored at normal illuminated laboratory conditions and analyzed after 12 Hours and 24hours. Standard and Test solution stability study was perform hours. Standards the difference between results of test solution at each stability time point to that of initial.
3. Specificity:
Specificity is the ability to access unequivocally the analyte in the presence of components Which may be expected to be present. Following solution shall be prepared and injected to prove the specificity nature of the Method.
· Blank (Mobile phase as a diluent)
· Placebo
Placebo Sample solution preparation:
Weighed 103.74mg of placebo material (Which is equivalent to 25mg of Metoprolol Succinate) and transferred to clean and dried 50mL of volumetric flask. Added 35 mL of Water, sonicate for 10minutes with intermittent shaking. After 10 minutes allow to cool the solution to room temperature and made volume up to the mark with Water. Filtered the solution through suitable 0.45µ Nylon syringe filter discarding 3-5mL of initial filtrate. Further dilute 0.5ml of filtered stock solution to 25ml with mobile phase, injected the resultant solution and chromatograms were recorded.
4. Linearity and Range:
Preparation of linearity solution:
The linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results Which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample. 5 levels of Linearity was performed from 50% to 150% of working concentration
linearity metoprolol succinate stock solution:
Weighed 25mg of Metoprolol Succinate and dissolved in 50mL with Water. Further diluted 5ml of stock solution to 50mL with Water (50µg/mL).
5. Limit of detection (lod) and limit of quantitation (loq):
Detection limit:
The detection limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a Sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value.
Quantitation limit:
The quantitation limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in A sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy.
As per ICH Q2R1 guidelines LOD and LOQ was determined by using the approach Based on The Calibration Curve in which residual standard deviation of a regression line was calculated And determined the LOD and LOQ by using following formula:
LOD = 3.3 σ / S
LOQ = 10 σ / S
Where,
σ = residual standard deviation of a regression line
S = Slope of regression line
6. Accuracy (% Recovery):
The accuracy of the analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the Value which is accepted either as a conventional true value or an accepted reference value and the value of the value found, Accuracy will be conducted in the range from 50 % to 150% of working concentration. Solution of each accuracy level was prepared in triplicate. Calculated % Recovery for each Sample, Mean %recovery for each level and overall recovery and also calculated %RSD for Each level and % RSD for overall recovery.
7. Precision:
Precision of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between a series of Measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogeneous test under the Prescribed conditions. Precision is of two types, Repeatability and Intermediate precision.
8. Robustness:
The robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by Small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability During normal usage.
Determination: Standard solution was injected under different chromatographic conditions as Shown below.
a) Changes in flow rate by ±10%. (±0.1ml/min)
b) Change in column oven temperature. (±2ºC)
c) Change in wavelength (±3nm)
Table No.3.Optimized Chromatographic Condition
|
Parameter |
Description |
|
Mode |
Isocratic |
|
Column Name |
Phenomenex C18, 250 mm X 4.6mm ID, 5 μm |
|
Detector |
UV Detector |
|
Injection Volume |
20 µl |
|
Wavelength |
222 nm |
|
Column Oven temp |
35ºC |
|
Mobile Phase |
Methanol: 0.1% OPA in Water (60:40%V/V) |
|
Flow Rate |
1.0 ml/min |
|
Diluent |
Mobile phase |
|
Run time |
6 Minutes |
Fig. No.2 Chromatogram of optimization trial
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
1) Filtration Study:
Filtration study of an analytical procedure checks the interference of extraneous components from filter, deposition on filter bed and compatibility of filter with sample. Performed on tablet test sample.
Table No.4. Results of Filter study
|
Sample description |
Area |
% Absolute difference |
|
Unfiltered |
4230205 |
NA |
|
0.45 µ PVDF filter |
4199825 |
0.72 |
|
0.45 µ Nylon filter |
4209304 |
0.49 |
2) Solution Stability:
Stability study was conducted for Standard as well as Test Sample. Stability study was performed at normal laboratory conditions. The solution was stored at normal illuminated laboratory conditions and analyzed at initial, after 12 hours and 24 hours.
Table No. 5. Results of Solution stability.
|
Sample solution |
Standard solution |
||||
|
Time point |
Area |
% Absolute difference |
Time point |
Area |
% Absolute difference |
|
Initial |
4231978 |
NA |
Initial |
4269302 |
NA |
|
12 Hours |
4203628 |
0.67 |
12 Hours |
4245745 |
0.55 |
|
24 Hours |
4191503 |
0.96 |
24 Hours |
4235978 |
0.78 |
3) Specificity:
Specificity is the ability to access unequivocally the analyte in the presence of components which may be expected to be present.
Blank and Placebo solution prepared and injected to check interference at R.T. of Metoprolol succinate.
Table No.6 Results of Specificity.
|
Description |
Observation |
|
Blank |
No interference at R.T. of Metoprolol succinate due to blank |
|
Placebo |
No interference at R.T. of Metoprolol succinate due to placebo |
4) Linearity and Range:
Linearity of an analytical method is its ability to elicit test results that are proportional to the concentration of analyte in samples within a given range.
Fig No.3 Calibration curve of Metoprolol succinate
Table No. 7 Linearity Data for Metoprolol succinate
|
Level |
Conc (µg/mL) |
Area |
Mean |
% RSD |
|
50% |
5.00 |
2086036 |
2083752 |
0.114 |
|
2081304 |
||||
|
2083915 |
||||
|
75% |
7.50 |
3176097 |
3173468 |
0.092 |
|
3170305 |
||||
|
3174001 |
||||
|
100% |
10.00 |
4282016 |
4279304 |
0.060 |
|
4278985 |
||||
|
4276910 |
||||
|
125% |
12.50 |
5322973 |
5328138 |
0.086 |
|
5329680 |
||||
|
5331761 |
||||
|
150% |
15.00 |
6379971 |
6384673 |
0.072 |
|
6384950 |
||||
|
6389097 |
Table no. 8. Data of linearity of Metoprolol succinate:
|
Sr No |
Parameter |
Result value |
Acceptance criteria |
|
1 |
Beer's linearity range |
5.0-15µg/mL |
NA |
|
2 |
Correlation coefficient (R2) |
0.99994 |
NLT 0.98 |
|
3 |
Intercept |
-52737.8 |
To be report |
|
4 |
Slope |
430260.48 |
To be report |
|
5 |
% RSD for area at each level |
NA |
NMT 2.0 |
The respective linear equation for Metoprolol succinate was
Y = M X + C
Y = 430260.48 X + -52737.8
Where, X = concentration of Analyte in µg/mL
Y = is area of peak.
M = Slope
C= Intercept
Conclusion:
From the calibration curve it was concluded that the Metoprolol succinate shows linear response in the range of 5.0-15.0μg/ml. The Regression value was found well within the limit.
5) Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ):
σ = 18476.36232 (Residual standard deviation of a regression line)
s = 430260.48 (Slope)
Detection limit (LOD):
LOD = 3.3 σ / S
LOD = 3.3 x 18476.36232 / 430260.48
LOD = 0.142 µg/mL
Quantitation limit (LOQ):
LOQ = 10 σ / S
LOQ = 10 x 18476.36232 / 430260.48
LOQ = 0.429µg/mL
6) Accuracy (Recovery):
The accuracy of an analytical method is the closeness of test results obtained by that method to the true value. The accuracy of an analytical method is determined by applying the method to analyzed samples to which known amounts of analyte have been added.
Table no .9 Result and statistical data of Accuracy of Metoprolol succinate
|
Level (%) |
Area |
Recovered conc (µg/mL) |
Added conc (µg/mL) |
% Recovery |
Mean Recovery |
% RSD |
|
50 |
2136025 |
5.00 |
5.04 |
99.21 |
99.61 |
1.0473 |
|
2145781 |
5.02 |
5.08 |
98.82 |
|||
|
2169810 |
5.08 |
5.04 |
100.79 |
|||
|
100 |
4263025 |
9.98 |
10.12 |
98.62 |
99.37 |
0.7976 |
|
4279685 |
10.02 |
10.00 |
100.20 |
|||
|
4260045 |
9.97 |
10.04 |
99.30 |
|||
|
150 |
6396197 |
14.97 |
15.12 |
99.01 |
99.80 |
1.1586 |
|
6478502 |
15.17 |
15.00 |
101.13 |
|||
|
6377150 |
14.93 |
15.04 |
99.27 |
Overall Recovery: 99.40 %
% RSD for Overall Recovery: 0.644
Chromatograms:
Fig No.4. Chromatogram of Accuracy 50%.
Fig No.5.Chromatogram of Accuracy 100%.
Fig No.6.Chromatogram of Accuracy 150%.
Acceptance criteria:
% Recovery for each level and overall recovery: 98.0 to 102.0%
% RSD for each level and overall recovery: NMT 2.0
Data interpretation:
Recovery of analytical procedure was found well within acceptance criteria at all 3 levels. % Recovery not gets hampered by changed in analyte concentration.
7) Precision:
Precision of an analytical method is the degree of agreement among individual test results when the procedure is applied repeatedly to multiple samplings of a homogenous sample. Precision of an analytical method is usually expressed as standard deviation or relative standard deviation. Precision was performed on Test sample.
Table No. 10. Result of intraday and interday precision for metoprolol succinate
|
Sr.No |
Parameters |
Interday Precision |
Intraday Precision |
|
1 |
Mean |
98.588 |
98.91 |
|
2 |
SDT |
1.13309 |
1.139889 |
|
3 |
%RSD |
1.149 |
1.152 |
8) Robustness:
The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage.
Following changes made under Robustness:
· Change in Wavelength
· Change in flow rate
· Change in column oven temperature
Table no.11 Result of Robustness study:
|
Change in Parameter |
R.T. |
Standard area |
Asymmetry |
Theoretical plates |
|
Wavelength by +3 NM (225 NM) |
3.04 |
4008250 |
1.04 |
8424 |
|
Wavelength by -3 NM (219 NM) |
3.04 |
4260369 |
1.01 |
8196 |
|
Flow rate by +10% (1.1mL/min) |
2.78 |
3725036 |
1.01 |
7942 |
|
Flow rate by -10% (0.9mL/min) |
3.38 |
4823910 |
1.05 |
9013 |
|
Column oven temp by +2ºC (37 ºC) |
3.05 |
4240692 |
1.03 |
8172 |
|
Column oven temp by -2ºC (32 ºC) |
3.06 |
4246978 |
1.06 |
8360 |
CONCLUSION:
The proposed RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Metoprolol Succinate in bulk and tablet dosage form was successfully developed and validated as per ICH guidelines. The method demonstrated excellent linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness, and stability. The retention time was appropriate with sharp peak symmetry and high theoretical plate count, indicating the efficiency of the chromatographic system. The low LOD and LOQ values reflect the method’s sensitivity. Moreover, the method was unaffected by minor changes in analytical conditions, confirming its robustness. Hence, the developed RP-HPLC method is simple, reliable, and highly suitable for routine quality control analysis and stability testing of metoprolol Succinate in pharmaceutical industries.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our Management and Principal, P.S.G.V.P. Mandal’s College of Pharmacy, Shahada for providing necessary facilities needed for this study.
REFERENCES:
1. Astra Zeneca AB. Metoprolol Succinate Extended-Release Tablets, USP – FDA Approved Label. NDA 19-962/S-032. Revised March 2006. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugsatfda
2. Palani, M. (2017). Structure of metoprolol succinate [Figure]. Potential of flavono Research Gate. Retrieved June18,2025, fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/figure/Structure-of-Metoprolol-succinate-its-molecular-Formula-is-C34H56N2O10-Molecular_fig2_319483087
3. Rao, B. V., Sowjanyal, G. N., Ajitha, A., Uma, V., and Rao, M. A review on stability-indicating HPLC method development. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 4(8): 405–423.
4. Rasaiah, J. C. Review of Molecular Theory of Solutions by Arieh Ben-Naim. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007; 129(28): 8922.
5. Yadav, V., and Bharkatiya, M. A review on HPLC method development and validation. Research Journal of Life Science, Bioinformatics, Pharmaceutical and Chemical Science. 2017; 2(6): 166. https://doi.org/10.26479/2017.0206.12
6. Bhardwaj, S. K. A review: HPLC method development and validation. International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2015.
7. Reddy, S. G. A review on new analytical method development and validation by RP-HPLC. International Research Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biosciences. 2017; 4(6): 41–50.
8. Chauhan, A., Mittu, B., and Chauhan, P. Analytical method development and Validation: A concise review. Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Techniques. 2015; 6(1).
9. Patel, D. Y., and Patil, J. K. A systematic review of method development and validation for Ramipril analysis using HPLC in cardiovascular research. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2024; 14(3): 180–184. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5675.2024.00032
10. Patel, D. Y., Patil, J. K., Chaudhari, H. V., and Kothari, R. M. Analytical method development and validation of Nitazoxanide by RP-HPLC method in API and tablet dosage forms. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2024; 14(4): 211–216. https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5675.2024.00038
11. Girase, A. R., and Patil, J. K. Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous quantification of Tamsulosin HCL and Fexofenadine in synthetic mixture by HPLC. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2024; 12(6): j837–j848. https://doi.org/10.1729/Journal.40011
12. Girase, A. R., Patil, J. K., Patel, D. Y., and Chaudhari, H. V. Exploring the evolution of Fexofenadine: A comprehensive review of analytical method development and validation. Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews in Virology and Microbiology. 2024; 1(1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11183374
13. Patel, D. Y., and Patil, J. K. Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Nebivolol Hydrochloride and Ramipril in synthetic mixture by HPLC method. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2024; 12(6): e749–e760. https://doi.org/10.1729/Journal.40006.
|
Received on 30.07.2025 Revised on 29.08.2025 Accepted on 15.09.2025 Published on 08.10.2025 Available online from October 15, 2025 Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2025; 15(4):279-287. DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2025.00044 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|